Maintenance Grouping Optimization with Air Systems to Improve Risk Management

Document Type : Original Research Article


Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran


Risk management and technical integrity of air systems are critical in the aviation industry. Maintenance grouping, as one of the main risk management tools in the aviation industry, refers to activities aimed at maintaining and improving the technical integrity or reducing the risk of maintaining aviation systems. Since there may be a set of equipment and parts in an air system that need maintenance or repair, optimization of maintenance grouping can improve performance and increase the safety and technical accuracy of the air system. This article will analyze and review the optimization methods of maintenance grouping in air systems. First, the importance of risk management and the technical accuracy of air systems will be examined, and then a detailed description of the maintenance grouping steps will be discussed. In the following, various optimization methods and algorithms used to improve maintenance grouping performance will be reviewed. Then, the advantages and limitations of each method will be discussed. In the end, the results of this research and its critical implications will be evaluated, and suggestions will be made to optimize maintenance grouping in air systems. The study results show that the genetic algorithm can improve resource utilization, scheduling efficiency, and cost reduction in maintenance grouping. This can significantly benefit the aviation industry, as it can help reduce costs, improve aircraft availability, and enhance safety.


Main Subjects

  1. de Souza, A. Wee Kwan Tan, H. Othman, and M. Garg, "A proposed framework for managing service parts in automotive and aerospace industries," Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 769-782, 2011, doi:
  2. Wankmüller and G. Reiner, "Coordination, cooperation and collaboration in relief supply chain management," Journal of Business Economics, vol. 90, pp. 239-276, 2020, doi:
  3. Elnaga and A. Imran, "The effect of training on employee performance," European Journal of Business and Management, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 137-147, 2013. [Online]. Available:
  4. H. MoghimiEsfandabadi, M.H. Djavareshkian and S. Abedi,. “Significance of Aviation Safety, Its Evaluation, and Ways to Strengthen Security,” International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 6, no. 2, pp.37-45, 2023, doi:
  5. Korba, P. Šváb, M. Vereš, and J. Lukáč, "Optimizing Aviation Maintenance through Algorithmic Approach of Real-Life Data," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 3824, 2023, doi:
  6. Theissler, J. Pérez-Velázquez, M. Kettelgerdes, and G. Elger, "Predictive maintenance enabled by machine learning: Use cases and challenges in the automotive industry," Reliability engineering & system safety, vol. 215, p. 107864, 2021, doi:
  7. Achouch et al., "On predictive maintenance in industry 4.0: Overview, models, and challenges," Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 16, p. 8081, 2022, doi:
  8. Jalali, Abdul Ali, R. Elahi, and Ahmad Ali, "Identification and prioritization of flight risk factors in the airport and its surrounding areas," Iranian Work Health Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 37-54, 2017. (in persion), [Online], Available:  
  9. I. Annex, "Safety management," ed.
  10. Li, Safety and Risk Assessment of Civil Aircraft During Operation. BoD–Books on Demand, 2020.
  11. Federal Aviation Administration, Aviation Instructor's Handbook. Skyhorse Publishing Inc., 2009.
  12. International Atomic Energy Agency, Application of the Management System for Facilities and Activities. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2006.
  13. Liangrokapart and T. Sittiwatethanasiri, "Strategic direction for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul hub after crisis recovery," Asia Pacific Management Review, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 81-89, 2023, doi:
  14. Meissner, A. Rahn, and K. Wicke, "Developing prescriptive maintenance strategies in the aviation industry based on a discrete-event simulation framework for post-prognostics decision making," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 214, p. 107812, 2021, doi:
  15. Wrd, N. McDonald, R. Morrison, D. Gaynor, and T. Nugent, "A performance improvement case study in aircraft maintenance and its implications for hazard identification," Ergonomics, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 247-267, 2010, doi:
  16. Stroeve, J. Smeltink, and B. Kirwan, "Assessing and advancing safety management in aviation," Safety, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 20, 2022, doi:
  17. C. Okoro, M. Zaliskyi, S. Dmytriiev, O. Solomentsev, and O. Srbna, "Optimization of Maintenance Task Interval of Aircraft Systems," International Journal of Computer Network & Information Security, vol. 14, no. 2, 2022, doi:
  18. R. Blischke and D. P. Murthy, Reliability: modeling, prediction, and optimization. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
  19. Adjoul, K. Benfriha, C. El Zant, and A. Aoussat, "Algorithmic strategy for simultaneous optimization of design and maintenance of multi-component industrial systems," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 208, p. 107364, 2021, doi:
  20. Cacereño, D. Greiner, and B. Galván, "Simultaneous optimization of design and maintenance for systems using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms and discrete simulation," Soft Computing, pp. 1-34, 2023, doi:
  21. h. Moghimi Esfandabadi and M. H. Djavareshkian, "Design and optimization of the wing fence of a lambda-shaped aircraft model to reduce the rolling moment coefficient," Technology in Aerospace Engineering, pp. 13-24, 2023, (in Persian), doi: