In Situ Switch Blade Displacement Measurements in A Railway Turnout for Short-Term Monitoring Application

Document Type : Case study

Authors

1 Avand Barzin Knowledge Enterprise, Tehran, Iran

2 School of Railway Engineering, Iran University of science and technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Due to the importance of the fundamental role of turnouts in network operations and their higher vulnerability than other assets, turnout condition monitoring is necessary for reliability-centered maintenance. Along with periodic visual inspections, real-time infrastructure condition detection can help introduce the structure's performance so that infrastructure maintenance is more reliable. A new approach for railway turnout pass-by condition detection is provided based on statistical process control (SPC) of damage-sensitive features (DSF) using switchblade lateral displacement (BLD) measurements.  BLD time series data is modeled using a neural network model to extract DSF. This approach is applied to 33 passenger trains. The results of the proposed approach are validated by analysis of BLD and switch rod force sensor outputs. This method can be applied in turnout short-term condition monitoring for condition detection, leading to preventive maintenance, proper track operation management, and increased reliability.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Pletz, W. Daves, and H. Ossberger, "A wheel passing a crossing nose: Dynamic analysis under high axle loads using finite element modelling*," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 226, no. 6, pp. 603-611, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409712448038.
  2. Ma, A. A. Mashal, and V. L. Markine, "Modelling and experimental validation of dynamic impact in 1:9 railway crossing panel," Tribology International, vol. 118, pp. 208-226, 2018/02/01/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.09.036.
  3. T. Torstensson, G. Squicciarini, M. Krüger, B. A. Pålsson, J. C. O. Nielsen, and D. J. Thompson, "Wheel–rail impact loads and noise generated at railway crossings – Influence of vehicle speed and crossing dip angle," Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 456, pp. 119-136, 2019/09/15/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.04.034.
  4. A. Boogaard, Z. Li, and R. P. B. J. Dollevoet, "In situ measurements of the crossing vibrations of a railway turnout," Measurement, vol. 125, pp. 313-324, 2018/09/01/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.094.
  5. Liu, V. L. Markine, H. Wang, and I. Y. Shevtsov, "Experimental tools for railway crossing condition monitoring (crossing condition monitoring tools)," Measurement, vol. 129, pp. 424-435, 2018/12/01/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.062.
  6. Jing, M. Siahkouhi, K. Qian, and S. Wang, "Development of a field condition monitoring system in high speed railway turnout," Measurement, vol. 169, p. 108358, 2021/02/01/ 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108358.
  7. Grossoni, P. Hughes, Y. Bezin, A. Bevan, and J. Jaiswal, "Observed failures at railway turnouts: Failure analysis, possible causes and links to current and future research," Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 119, p. 104987, 2021/01/01/ 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104987.
  8. Ma, P. Wang, J. Xu, and R. Chen, "Effect of the vertical relative motion of stock/switch rails on wheel–rail contact mechanics in switch panel of railway turnout," Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 1687814018790659, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018790659.
  9. Ma, P. Wang, J. Xu, and R. Chen, "Comparison of non-Hertzian modeling approaches for wheel–rail rolling contact mechanics in the switch panel of a railway turnout," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 233, no. 4, pp. 466-476, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0954409718799825.
  10. UFC 4-860-03 Railroad Track Maintenance And Safety Standard, U. S. A. C. o. Engineer, 13 February 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_4_860_03_2008.pdf
  11. E. Kosnik, W. Zhang, and P. L. Durango-Cohen, "Application of Statistical Process Control for Structural Health Monitoring of a Historic Building," Journal of Infrastructure Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 05013002, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000164.
  12. Bornn, C. R. Farrar, G. Park, and K. Farinholt, "Structural Health Monitoring With Autoregressive Support Vector Machines," Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 131, no. 2, 2009, doi: 10.1115/1.3025827.
  13. Mei, A. Mita, and J. Zhou, "An improved substructural damage detection approach of shear structure based on ARMAX model residual," Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 218-236, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1766.
  14. Mehrzad, "Presenting a prediction model for the safe passage speed of the train through the main line of the turnout based on the measurement of mechanical and geometrical parameters using soft computing," Ph.D. dissertation, IUST university, 2022.
  15. Mehrzad and S. Ataei, "Railway crossing vertical vibration response prediction using a data-driven neuro-fuzzy model – Influence of train factors," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 235, no. 9, pp. 1086-1098, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0954409720986666.
  16. Ataei and K. Mehrzad, "Permanent condition Monitoring of Yatri P2 Station Report," Intelligent monitoring of infrastructures Lab., Iran University of Science & Technology, 2017.
  17. Hudson, B. Hagan, Deep Learning Toolbox, Getting Started Guide Mark, Version 14.4, MathWorks, Inc. 2022.
  18. R. Joseph, "Optimal ratio for data splitting," Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 531-538, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.11583.
  19. C. Navidi, Statistics for engineers and scientists, 3th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 2010.
  20. W. Hines, D. C. Montgomery, D. M. Goldsman, and C. M. Borror, Probability and Statistics in Engineering. Wiley, 2003.
International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application
Volume 6, Issue 1
July 2023
Pages 19-25

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 31 May 2023
  • Revise Date: 19 July 2023
  • Accept Date: 22 July 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics