The Effect of Momentum Loss on Detonation Failure at Very Low Activation Energy

Document Type : Original Research Article


1 Aerospace Research Institute, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Thermal Sciences and Fluid Mechanics, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran


In this paper, the behavior of detonation waves in a non-ideal environment has been studied. Modeling of detonation has been performed based on one-dimensional Euler equations (momentum conservation) by considering friction as the momentum loss source term in the equation with a single-step Arrhenius law as the chemical kinetics model. Piecewise parabolic method(PPM) has been used to simulate the flow and solve the Euler equations. The shock front conservative tracking algorithm was used to have the finer mesh (Adaptive mesh refinement AMR) at the wave front location. The non-ideal environment is an environment in which external factors, such as friction, cause the detonation behavior to deviate from the ideal behavior. Therefore, the innovation of the present work is modeling detonation in these non-ideal conditions for mixtures with very low activation energy to detect its failure mechanism. The effect of momentum loss on the detonation behavior has been parametrically studied at very low activation energy (in which the detonation behavior is completely regular, here, 8). Depending on the level of mixture activation energy, the detonation has its failure mechanism. It is concluded that the failure mechanisms of the detonation in this study are the mechanisms of pressure drop and chemical reaction rate reduction. The un-burnt packet mechanism is not involved in it. The detonation wave, regardless of the amount of mixture activation energy, fails anyway as the momentum loss exceeds a critical limit.


Main Subjects

  1. Chapman, “VI. On the rate of explosion in gases,”Lond.Edinb.Dubl.Phil.Mag,vol. 47, no. 284, p.90, 1899.
  2. Jouguet, “On the propagation of chemical reactions in gases,”J. de mathematiquesPures et Appliquees, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 347, 1905
  3. Zeldovich,“On the theory of detonation propagation in gaseous systems,”Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz, vol. 10,no.5, p.542, 1940.
  4. Neumann,Theory of detonation waves (OD-02). Technical Report, National Defense Research Committee of the Office of Scientific Research and Development,no. 238, 1942.
  5. Döring,“Über den detonationsvorgang in gasen”,Ann. Phys, vol. 43, no. 5, p.421, 1943.
  6. Mazaheri,Mechanism of the onset of detonation in direct initiation,Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Canada,1997.
  7. Dionne,Theoretical study of the propagation of non-ideal detonations,PhD Thesis, McGill University, Montréal, 2000.
  8. Li, J.Li, L.Zhao, C.Xiong, X.Mi, and AJ.Higgins,“The influence of spatial heterogeneity in energetic material on non-ideal detonation propagation,”InInternational Symposium on Shock Waves, Springer, Cham: p. 89, 2017.
  9. Bengoechea, J.A.Gray, J.Reiss, J.P.Moeck, O.C. Paschereitand, J.Sesterhenn, “Detonation initiation in pipes with a single obstacle for mixtures of hydrogen and oxygen-enriched air”, Combust. Flame, vol. 198, no. 1, p. 290, 2018.
  10. Sun, and C.Wang,“Study on the analog system of non-ideal detonation with two step chemical reaction model,”Bulletin of the American Physical Society,vol. 64, no. 18,pp.64, 2019.
  11. Short, SJ.Voelkel, and C.Chiquete,“Steady detonation propagation in thin channels with strong confinement,”J. Fluid Mech,no. 889, 2020. (publish online)
  12. Kuzmin, “Shock wave instability in a bent channel with subsonic/supersonic exit”, Adv. Aircr. Spacecr. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 19, 2019.
  13. Debnath,and K.M.Pandey, “Numerical investigation of detonation combustion wave propagation in pulse detonation combustor with nozzle”,  Adv. Aircr. Spacecr. Sci., vol. 7, no. 3,p.187, 2020.
  14. Xiao, A.Sow, B.M. Maxwell,and M.I.Radulescu, “Effect of boundary layer losses on 2D detonation cellular structures”, Proc. Combust. Inst., vol. 38, no. 3,p. 3641, 2021.
  15. Sabzpooshani,Two-dimensional simulation of gas detonation in order to obtain the effect of transverse waves on its propagation, Ph.D. Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran, 2006.
  16. Radulescu, and J.H.Lee,“The failure mechanism of gaseous detonations: experiments in porous wall tubes,”Combust Flame, vol. 131, no. 1, pp.29, 2002.
  17. Colella, and P.R.Woodward,“The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations,”J. Comput. Phys, vol. 54, no. 1, p.174, 1984.
  18. Bourlioux,Numerical studies of unstable detonations. Doctoral dissertation, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, USA, 1991.
  19. Sabzpooshani, A.Hashemi, and H.Karimaei, Investigation of the behavior of the non-ideal detonation in the mixtures with activation energy in stable range,9th International Conference of the Aerospace Society of Iran, 2009.
  20. Sabzpooshani, and H.Karimaei, Numerical study of friction effect on non-ideal detonation wave behavior at the stability boundary of ideal detonation,The 1st International Conference and the 6th General Conference of Explosives, Pyrotechnic and Propellant, Iran, 2011.
  21. Fickett, and WC. Davis,Detonation,1st ed., University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 1979;17.