Detecting Unsafe Conditions of a Lathe using an Artificial Neural Network with Three-axis Acceleration Data

Document Type : Original Research Article


School of Industrial Engineering, University of Ulsan, Korea


Detecting unsafe conditions of a lathe is critical to prevent hazards in a workplace. This study proposed an artificial neural network (ANN) model to classify the state of a lathe into one of the nine conditions (two normal conditions and seven unsafe conditions) based on three-axis acceleration data. The two normal conditions were (1) idle and (2) normal processing. The seven unsafe conditions included unsafe states of a lathe (i.e., eccentric rotation, chipping, improper workpiece fixation, and base looseness) and a worker (i.e., glove contact, hair contact, and necklace contact). The acceleration data for each condition were measured for 30 s using a small lathe and smoothed with the moving average. The datasets were randomly divided into three different sets for training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%). The ANN model was trained using the training and validation sets and its performance was evaluated using the testing set. The testing results showed that the classification accuracy of the ANN model proposed in this study (100%) was better than that of a multiclass linear support vector machine model (68%). The procedure and the ANN model established in this study can be utilized to detect unsafe conditions of a lathe and other industrial machines.


Main Subjects

  1. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA)., “Report: Industrial Disaster Anal. for 2016”: 763, 2016.
  2. Smith, S., “Injuries, illnesses, and fatal injuries in mining in 2010,”Workplace Injuries, 2(1): pp. 1-8, 2013.
  3. Dźwiarek, M., and Latała, A.,“Analysis of occupational accidents: prevention through the use of additional technical safety measures for machinery,”Int. J.of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 22(2): pp. 186-192, 2016.
  5. Jiang, Q., Shen, Y., Li, H., and Xu, F,“New fault recognition method for rotary machinery based on information entropy and a probabilistic neural network,”Sensors, 18(2): pp. 337, 2018.
  6. McCormick, A. C., and Nandi, A. K,“Classification of the rotating machine condition using artificial neural networks,”In Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 211(6): pp. 439-450, 1997.
  7. Samanta, B., and Al-Balushi, K. R, “Artificial neural network based fault diagnostics of rolling element bearings using time-domain features,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 17(2): pp. 317-328, 2003.
  8. Rajeswari, C., Sathiyabhama, B., Devendiran, S., andManivannan, K., “Bearing fault diagnosis using wavelet packet transform, hybrid PSO and support vector machine,”Procedia Engineering, 97: pp. 1772-1783, 2014.
  9. Samanta, B., Al-Balushi, K. R., and Al-Araimi, S. A, “Artificial neural networks and support vector machines with genetic algorithm for bearing fault detection,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 16(7-8): pp. 657-665, 2003.
  10. Liu, Z., Guo, W., Hu, J., and Ma, W, “A hybrid intelligent multi-fault detection method for rotating machinery based on RSGWPT, KPCA and Twin SVM,” ISA Transactions, 66: pp. 249-261, 2017.
  11. Li, K., and Chen, P.,“Intelligent method for diagnosing structural faults of rotating machinery using ant colony optimization,”Sensors, 11(4): pp. 4009-4029, 2011.
  12. Painuli, S., Elangovan, M., and Sugumaran, V., “Tool condition monitoring using K-star algorithm,”Expert Systems with Applications,41(6):pp.2638-2643,2014.
  13. Aditiya, N. A., Dharmawan, M. R., Darojah, Z., and Sanggar, D. R.,“Fault diagnosis system of rotating machines using Hidden Markov Model (HMM),”In 2017 International Electronics Symposium on Knowledge Creation and Intelligent Computing, 177-181, 2017.
  14. Heo, S., and Lee, J. H.,“Fault detection and classification using artificial neural networks,”IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) PapersOnLine, 51(18): pp. 470-475, 2018.
  15. Dharmawan, M. R., Aditiya, N. A., Darojah, Z., Sanggar, D. R.,“Fault diagnosis system of rotating machines using continuous wavelet transform and artificial neural network,”In 2017 International Electronics Symposium on Knowledge Creation and Intelligent Computing (IES-KCIC), 173-176, 2017.
  16. Patel, J.P., and Upadhyay, S. H.,“Comparison between artificial neural network and support vector method for a fault diagnostics in rolling element bearings,”Procedia Egineering, 144:pp.390-397, 2016.
  17. Mahamad, A. K., Saon, S., and Hiyama, T., “Predicting remaining useful life of rotating machinery based artificial neural network,”Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 60(4):pp.1078-1087, 2010.
  18. Rajakarunakaran, S., Venkumar, P., Devaraj, D., and Rao, K. S. P.,“Artificial neural network approach for fault detection in rotary system,”Appl. Soft Computing, 8(1): pp. 740-748,2008.
  21. Hamelund, C.,Machine Safeguarding at the Point of Operation: A Guide for Finding Solutions to Machine Hazards, Oregon OSHA, Department of Consumer & Business Services, 2007.
  24. Liu, R., Yang, B., Zio, E., and Chen, X, “Artificial intelligence for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: A review,”Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 108: pp. 33-47, 2018.
  25. Saravanan, N., Siddabattuni, V. K., and Ramachandran, K. I., “Fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box using artificial neural network (ANN), and proximal support vector machine (PSVM),”Applied Soft Computing, 10(1): pp. 344-360, 2010.
  26. Jack, L. B., and Nandi, A. K., “Fault detection using support vector machines and artificial neural networks, augmented by genetic algorithms,”Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 16(2-3): pp. 373-390, 2002.
  27. EIbrahim, L. H., and Mohamed, Z. E., “Improving error back propagation algorithm by using cross entropy error function and adaptive learning rate,” International Journal of Computer Applications, 61(8): pp: 5-9, 2017.
  28. Wu, S. D., Wu, P. H., Wu, C. W., Ding, J. J., and Wang, C. C.,“Bearing fault diagnosis based on multiscale permutation entropy and support vector machine,”Entropy, 14(8):pp. 1343-1356,2012.
  29. Sugumaran, V., Muralidharan, V., and Ramachandran, K. I.,“Feature selection using decision tree and classification through proximal support vector machine for fault diagnostics of roller bearing,”Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(2):pp. 930-942,2007.
  30. Vapnik, V. N.,Statistical Learning Theory, John Wiley & Sons, Wiley New York,1998.
  31. Liu, Y., and Zheng, Y. F.,“One-against-all multi-class SVM classification using reliability measures,”In Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005, 2: pp. 849-854, 2005.