Neutronic and Safety Analysis of CAREM-25 Small Modular Reactor Using Supermc Advanced Code

Document Type : Short/Technical paper

Authors

1 Department of Physics and Energy Engineering, School of Sciences, Amirkabir University of Technolog , Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Computer simulation is crucial due to the importance of estimating various parameters of a reactor in different functions. Hence, simulation codes and programs must have high credibility to perform complex calculations. SuperMC is a powerful, accurate graphic user interface Monte Carlo method-based code to simulate and model nuclear systems due to the unique features of CAREM-25 reactor, including high efficiency, complex geometry is chosen to be modeled by SuperMC and MCNPX codes to calculate neutronic and control parameters such as multiplication factor, flux and power distribution, and control rod worth. Comparing the results of the two simulations mechanism indicates the proximity of the computed values with less than a %2 difference in neutronic parameters. Also, SuperMC results show an appropriate consistency with benchmarks and references. Consequently, SuperMC can be considered an accurate, simple, and GUI Advanced program to simulate nuclear reactors.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments, A Supplement to: IAEA Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS), International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA, Vienna; 2014. [Online], Available: https://aris.iaea.org/Publications/SMR_Book_2020.pdf
  2. Status of Innovative Small and Medium Sized Reactor Designs Reactors with Conventional Refueling Schemes, International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEATECDOC-1485, IAEA, Vienna, 2005. Available: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_1485_web.pdf
  3. Tashakor, E. Zarifi, and S.Naminazari, Neutronic simulation of CAREM-25 small modular reactor, Progress in Nuclear Energy, Volume 99, August 2017, Pages 185-195, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.05.016.
  4. Boado Magana, H., Delmastrob, D.F., Markiewiczb, M., Lopassob, E., Diez, F., Gim_enezb, M., Rauschertb, A., Halperta, S., Chocr_onc, M., Dezzuttic, J.C., Pirani, H., Balbi, C., CAREM Prototype Construction and Licensing Status, International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA, CN-164e5S01, 2012. Available: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/P1500_CD_Web/htm/pdf/topic5/5S01_D.%20Delmastro.pdf
  5. Ishida, M., Advisory Group Meeting on Optimizing Technology, Safety and Economics of Water-Cooled Reactors, Development of New Nuclear Power Plant in Argentina, (Vienna, Austria), 2000. Available: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_1290_prn.pdf
  6. IAEA, Small and Medium Sized Reactors: Status and Prospects, International Seminar held in Cairo, Egypt, 27–31 May 2001, Available: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/CSPS-14-P/CSP-14_part1.pdf.
  7. IAEA-TECDOC-1245, Performance of Operating and advanced light water reactor designs Proceedings of a Technical Committee meeting held in Munich, Germany, 23-25 October 2000, Available: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/32/048/32048859.pdf.
  8. Leppänen. J, Development of a new Monte Carlo reactor physics code (D.Sc. thesis), Helsinki University of Technology, 2007. Available: https://serpent.vtt.fi/serpent/download/P640.pdf
  9. , IAEA 1437, SuperMC 3.3.0 User Manual-EN, Super Monte Carlo simulation program for nuclear and radiation process, IAEA 2016, available: https://www.oecd-nea.org/tools/abstract/detail/iaea1437/.
  10. Zhang, B. et al., Criticality validation of SuperMC with ICSBEP. Nucl. Energy 87, 494–499, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.10.004.
  11. Wanbin Tan, Pengcheng Long, Guangyao Sun, Jun Zou, Lijuan Hao, Neutronics analysis of JSI TRIGA Mark II reactor benchmark experiments with, SuperMC3.3, Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2019, doi: 1016/j.net.2019.05.014.
  12. Liqin Hu, Pengcheng Long, Jing Song, Tao He, Fang Wang, Lijuan Hao, Bin Wu, Shengpeng Yu, Peng He, Lei Wang, Guangyao Sun, Jun Zou, Quan Gan, Guomin Sun, Zhongyang Li, Yican Wu, SuperMC cloud for nuclear design and safety evaluation, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2019, doi:1016/j.anucene.2019.07.019.
  13. Shu Zhang, Shengpeng Yu, Peng He, Verification of SuperMC with ITER C-Lite neutronic model, Fusion Engineering and Design, 2016, doi: 1016/j.fusengdes.2016.11.001.
  14. Pelowitz, D.B., MCNPXTM User’s Manual Version 2.6.0. Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2008.
  15. Liu, B., Lv, X., Zhao, W., Wang, K., Tu, J., Ouyang, X., The comparison of MCNP perturbation technique with MCNP difference method in critical calculation. Eng. Des. 240, 2005e2010, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.04.022.
  16. LouhanrongYu et al., Development and testing of a coupled SuperMC and SUBCHANFLOW code for LWR simulations, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Volume 144, 1 September 2020, 107465, doi: 1016/j.anucene.2020.107465
  17. Isaac KwasiBaidoo et al., Analysis of gas-cooled fast reactor integral shielding experiment: “Wuerenlingen iron benchmark experiment (PROTEUS)” using SuperMC, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Volume 152, March 2021, 108016, doi:1016/j.anucene.2020.108016.
  18. LiqinHu et al., SuperMC cloud for nuclear design and safety evaluation, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Volume 134, December 2019, Pages 424-431, doi: 1016/j.anucene.2019.07.019.
  19. ZeeshanJamil et al., Validation of SuperMC code by simulating a Metal-cooled fast reactor – BFS-62-3A, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Volume 113, March 2018, Pages 122-129, doi: 1016/j.anucene.2017.11.008.
  20. YicanWu et al., CAD-based Monte Carlo program for integrated simulation of nuclear system SuperMC, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Volume 82, August 2015, Pages 161-168, doi:1051/snamc/201406022.
  21. Delmastro, D., Mazzi, R., Santecchia, A., Ishida, V., Gomez, S., Gomez de Soler, S., Ramilo, L., CAREM: An Advanced Integrated PWR’. In IAEA, Small and Medium Sized Reactors: Status and Prospects, IAEA-CSP-14/P, pp. 224e231, 2002. Available: https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:33045038.
  22. Mazzi, R., Santecchia, A., Ishida, V., Delmastro, D., Gomez, S., Gomez de Soler, S., Ramilo, L., CAREM Project Development. In IAEA, Small and Medium Sized Reactors: Status and Prospects, IAEA-CSP-14/P, pp. 232e243, 2002. Available: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/33/045/33045014.pdf?r=1
  23. Boado Magan, H., Delmastro, D.F., Markiewicz, M., Lopasso, E., Diez, F., Gim_enez, M., Rauschert, A., Halpert, S., Chocr_on, M., Dezzutti, J.C., Pirani, H., Balbi, C., Fittipaldi, A., Schlamp, M., Murmis, G.M., Lis, H., CAREM Project Status, Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, Article ID 140373, 2011, doi:1155/2011/140373.
  24. Villarino, E., Hergenreder, D., Matzkin, S., NeutronicCore Performance of CAREM-25 Reactor. INVAP, Argentina, 2012. Available: https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:32046441.
  25. Diego Ferraro, Calculo de exposicion de estructuras interiores recipinte de presion del CAREM-25 mediante MCNP. Instituto Balseiro Universidad Nacional de Cuyo Comision Nacional de Energia Atomica, San Carlod de Bariloche Argentina, 2009. Available: https://ricabib.cab.cnea.gov.ar/151/
  26. Saeed Zare Ganjaroodi and Ali Pazirandeh, Neutronic study of CAREM-25 advanced small modular reactor using Monte Carlo simulation, atw Vol. 65, Available: https://inis.iaea.org/search/searchsinglerecord.aspx?recordsFor=SingleRecord&RN=52041574
International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application
Volume 6, Issue 2
September 2023
Pages 107-113

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 December 2023
  • Revise Date: 09 January 2024
  • Accept Date: 30 December 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics