Evaluation of the Possible Hazards of an Ethanol Storage Tank

Document Type : Case study

Authors

1 Safety Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran

2 Postgraduate Student in HSE Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The presence of chemicals in process industries such as the food industry has always been subject to risks like fire, explosion and release of toxic substances. The occurrence of such incidents have serious impact on the funds and life resources. In this article, we have tried to identify hazards of Ethanol storage tank with PHAST modeling to provide solutions to reduce and manage risks in Behnoush Iran Company. The most dangerous scenarios were selected according to the available conditions 100 mm diameter tank leakage, 3 Inches diameter short pipe leakage and Tank rupture in the summer and winter cases. According to the results, a leak with diameter of 100 mm with radiation of 37.5 KW/m2 and catastrophic rupture are also very dangerous due to the suddenness of the accident and has the ability to damage the tanks. Therefore, by modeling and evaluating the consequences of such accidents, it was proposed to reduce the hazards and prevent the occurrence of more serious accidents by using more advanced fire detection and firefighting equipment, the use of fireproof structures, continuous training of people, and the promotion of safety culture and fire team deployment.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • Mehdi Gohar Rokhy et al. “Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Analysis in Process Industries”, 1st Edition, Daneshgaran Sanatpajooh, 2009.
  • Be-Hengam Quarterly, Year 10, No. 35, Winter 2017.
  • Mehdi Jahangiri et al. “Risk Management and Evaluation”, 2nd Edition, Fanava Publications, 2015.
  • Henk W.M. Witlox, “Verification and validation of Phast consequence models for accidental releases of toxic or flammable chemicals to the atmosphere”, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 55, pp 457–470, 2018.
  • Saeed Givechi et al. “Risk Analysis of Oil Production Facilities Using PHAST Software to Develop Emergency Response Plan”, 4th International Conference on Environmental Planning and Management, June 2017.
  • Bahman Abdolhamidzadeh, “Quantitative and Qualitative Risk Assessment in Process Industries”, 2nd Edition, Tehran Publication, 2012.
  • Green, D.W and Perry, R.H., “Perry Chemicals Engineering Handbook”, eighth ed, McGrawhill Section 26 “Process safety” 2007.
  • Fisher, H.G et al. “Emergency Relief System Design Using DIERS Technology”, ISBN No. 0-8169-0568-1, Pub. No. X-123. AICHE, New York, 1992.
  • CCPS, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, second ed, New York Section 2.1.1-discharge rate models, 2000.
  • Mannan, S. (Ed.), “Lees' Loss Prevention in the Process Industries: hazard Identification, Assessment and Control”, fourth ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2012.
  • TNO, “Methods for the Calculation of Physical Effects (Dutch TNO Yellow Book)”, PGS2, CPR14E, 2005.
  • Guideline for consequence analysis of chemical releases, center for chemical process safety of the American institute of chemical engineers, 1999.
  • Esmaeil Zarei, “The Role of Modeling and Outcome Evaluation in Improving”, The Safety Level of Hazardous Industrial Facilities, Iran Occupational Health Monthly, Volume 10, No. 6, 2013.
  • McQuaid, J., “Some Experiments on the Structure of Stably Stratified Shear Flows”, Technical Paper P21. Safety in Mines Research Establishment, Sheffield, UK, 1976.
  • Petersen, R.L. and Ratcliff, M.A., “Effect of homogeneous and heterogeneous surface roughness on HTAG dispersion”, Contract for API, Draft Report CPP-87–0417, 1988.
  • Joaquim Casal, “evaluation of the effects and consequences of major accidents in industrial plans”, Elsevier, 2008.
  • CCPS, Guidelines for Evaluating the characteristics of vapor Cloud Explosions, flash fire and BLEVEs, New York, 1994.
  • Ghashghaei R et al. “Environmental Assessment of Styreneas a Dangerous Substance Entering the Container Terminal Using the ALOHA and PHAST Software” Journal of Health, Autumn 2019.
  • Rasoul khorram, “Modeling the Outcome of Chlorine Emission Based on Emergency Response Planning Values over 24 Hours Using the PHAST Software”, Journal of Military Medicine 2020.
  • H Cheraghi et al. “Consequence modeling of the ethylene oxide storage tanks explosion using the PHAST software”, Iran. J. Health & Environ, 2018.
  • Farideh Atabi et al. “Assessment of safe distance for five toxic materials commonly in the accidents of chemical road transportation using ALOHA and PHAST software and CEI index: Case of Tehran-Qazvin Highway”, Iran Occupational Health, Oct-Nov 2017.
  • Sara Shahedi Aliabadiet al., “Evaluation of Consequence Modeling of Fire on Methane Storage Tanks in a Gas Refinery”, Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering, No 9, Volume 3, Issue 1, August 2016.
  • Zahra soleimani et al., “Modeling of fire and explosion in the compressor unit of CNG refueling station using PHAST software”, 6th National Conference Strategic Research in Chemistry and Enginering with Emphasis on Iranian Native Technologies”, December, 2019.
  • Reza peyghami ganji et al., “Leak modeling and rupture of Petrol pipeline using PHAST software”, 5th National Conference on New Research in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, January 2019.
Volume 4, Issue 1
January 2021
Pages 31-38
  • Receive Date: 01 May 2021
  • Revise Date: 28 August 2021
  • Accept Date: 20 September 2021
  • First Publish Date: 20 September 2021